So are we to assume you were able to redo the photographs and the ledger properly?
I was following the audit as you published. Why was the judge able to ignore your evidence? Just the other day I commented on Hofts article about Clements new movie that it was shameful the way the Hofts ignored you.
I just don't understand how you got ignored so completely.
Would there be an effect or corruption of data if the date or time stamp on the data is indifferent to original generating device or different between transferring devices?
Or by size differences between the page or image file sizes. In other words, if the original file was copied then manipulated and replaced as if it were the original, but showed a different amount of bits?
What I see is we have incompetent election leadership who shouldn't be in charge of elections. This is deliberate sabotage and it shouldn't be interpreted as anything else.
Jovan: regrettably, the Maricopa audit was absolutely NOT a "full forensic audit" — it was a partial forensic audit. See our Report as to the three major elements that comprise a full forensic audit <https://election-integrity.info/Post_Election_Audits.pdf>. The reason that is was partial (according to a conversation I had with Doug Logan) is due to the limited amount funded by the Arizona legislature.
So are we to assume you were able to redo the photographs and the ledger properly?
I was following the audit as you published. Why was the judge able to ignore your evidence? Just the other day I commented on Hofts article about Clements new movie that it was shameful the way the Hofts ignored you.
I just don't understand how you got ignored so completely.
God bless you for all you've done.
How To Sabotage A FULL FORENSIC AUDIT?
Hire Clements :P
Would there be an effect or corruption of data if the date or time stamp on the data is indifferent to original generating device or different between transferring devices?
Or by size differences between the page or image file sizes. In other words, if the original file was copied then manipulated and replaced as if it were the original, but showed a different amount of bits?
Here is the answer you asked me to get from the Chat on locals today:
In his order, Jantzen said he has been working on a “minute entry,” a type of court order, and hoped to have it done prior to Friday afternoon.
“But a weekend fire in the court’s home and some emergencies added to my calendar have prevented completion of that minute entry,” the judge wrote.
The order comes more than six months after Jantzen threw out Hamadeh’s original challenge of the election results.
This was found reported here: https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2023/07/15/arizona-judge-rules-no-new-trial-for-hamadeh/
Whatever happened with the forensic audit?...Im sure demorats will say nothing was found, which means MUCH was found.
So glad you were able to see that these photos were corrupted in time to take them again so that you had a full set images you could use! Nice work!
Horrible. 😪
Jovan, what you're saying is the forensics were sabotaged once you agreed to stay off the floor of the audit.
Why are you coming out now with this?
Can you now bring this up to the audit committee?
This was more than two years ago, the ballots have been destroyed, correct?
Did you catch who messed with the quads?
What I see is we have incompetent election leadership who shouldn't be in charge of elections. This is deliberate sabotage and it shouldn't be interpreted as anything else.
Jovan: regrettably, the Maricopa audit was absolutely NOT a "full forensic audit" — it was a partial forensic audit. See our Report as to the three major elements that comprise a full forensic audit <https://election-integrity.info/Post_Election_Audits.pdf>. The reason that is was partial (according to a conversation I had with Doug Logan) is due to the limited amount funded by the Arizona legislature.