Jovan, I believe your work is solid but it is only in one state and county. It is not possible that you are the only election fraud investigator that is not a “con.” You cannot disparage everyone else and expect anyone to take you seriously. This makes me very sad that patriots who each worked so hard have now dissolved into a circular firing squad. And I’m afraid the state is going to come after you demanding your data as state property (which they wish to destroy). I suppose that “God is in control” and we just have to hope things work out despite the chaos.
My goal is NOT presenting myself, team or work as "we are the only ones not a con". What I am doing is pointing out "what will not stand up in a court of law" and that it very differnt from what you characterized. My contract clearly states "our data" is "our data" and there is no way around that. As for that, it is what it is. But it will be very interesting to see what "pops up" In fact, we took an unsolicited call (from AZ person), talked about sensative data (in Az), that was shared with a Conservative Lawmaker and then the CLAIM from AZ Mirror popped up "outta the blue". LOL All of these things and events can now be easily be tracked back to "people" in AZ who say they are "fighting the good fight and are Patriots" but they prove undercover to be something different. Yet, as always, this is a battle, a war and tons of junk. We knew this going in an prepared wisely and legally. We are in it for the long haul and we see the "movements" going on. But as always - Truth always comes forth.
I agree except the only one I see firing is Jovan. I've not heard anyone he takes pot shots at even bring him up, but he names names or at least shows pictures. Everyone is wrong but him. I got sick of it a long time ago. In 2020, paper was the backup to the fraud, intended coverup so to speak. He's not wrong about the paper anomalies - yes they messed that up big time, so it was easy to find. Digging deeper was not as easy, but it was and the findings are all correct. I just wish he would stop disparaging everyone else...it doesn't look good - on him. This should be a concerted effort, but according to him his findings are the only election fraud that occurred. Makes one wonder who's side he's on.
Jovan, this is not necessary. Everyone would welcome your paper part of election fraud if you would consider it is just a part of the overall issues with our elections. It was the backup to the fraud - coverup part, full stop. No one really fighting this with receipts that will be revealed soon, are attacking you, and I highly recommend you join forces rather than making this your way or no way was there fraud shown by their investigations/intel/proof. I don't know if it's too late, but if it isn't, could you try to make your way back to helping show the coverup part to this? If you can't or won't do that then you're not helping, you're hindering. Also, the main issue with the attorneys, orgs and courts is lawfare and you know it. Coomer thinks he's protected. Backing down or catering to that is not the answer. Certainly you are not - right?
I'm saying this as someone who appreciated your input...until it was put as the only way fraud occurred and you lashed out at anyone with any other discourse in the matter. Almost in a nefarious way to get people to NOT look. Too many people know better than that now and much will be revealed...in the right time - some people's lives are on the line, one you are going against. I've just gotten to the point I'm not sure you ever intended on helping? And no, asking to have people on your show before you've even seen ALL the information being released does not work. They have networks or platforms too - maybe go to them?
Have you talked with Trump? Are you an attorney or in the legal field? Just curious.
Strange, it seems to me the paper evidence has been suppressed and ridiculed from day one, beginning with the Arizona AG’s office. Many act like the audit findings don’t even exist. They would be welcomed if it wasn’t for personality issues? That makes one wonder how serious the ‘fighters’ are about proving their own findings.
Any reveals accompanied by hard evidence are welcome! Why push it so close to midterms, tho? Unless there is a solution where the judicial system is left out… Otherwise, it would behoof many to take Jovan’s advice, lawyer or not.
Everything in question has been suppressed and ridiculed from day one, by either the SOS, Election Commission, AG, Governor, along with the media, etc. – all based on Krebs and others saying “It was the most secure election”. I think you misunderstood me, I said he and his paper evidence would be welcome to be discussed more than it already has if he were actually interested in adding it to the piles of evidence, but he denies it all instead and ridicules them all. The proof is available in many reports, but what Jovan does is dismiss them as being false, incorrect, made up, etc., and claims the only fraud that really exists is paper related. Well there are some places, like CO where the paper was not the issue and if Tina Peters had not backed up the election machines information CO would have gotten away with breaking federal law by deleting the 2020 and 2021 election information from the machines – so no AUDIT could occur. And, that doesn’t explain what many of us saw before our very eyes when touch machines changed our choice, the tally numbers mysteriously reduced on TV – I mean as people were still voting, how do vote tallies reverse, among many other unexplained issues.
What happened is people were threatened and many were sued – by the voting machine companies, we were told we couldn’t question our elections, even though they have been throughout time. And according to Jovan that was to be expected and we went about it all wrong…
How is that advice? And after all the work 100’s of 1000’s of people did they should just walk away because it’s a losing battle? Because of the way they presented it? The problem is the lawfare, companies should not be able to sidestep audits of the people when we pay for the service. At some point there has to be accountability for errors, let alone fraud! If we walk away now, we should just turn out the lights on our nation. No thanks, Jovan, but for some reason I think you are really hoping we’ll bite. And believe me “An external villain lets us outsource the shame.”, is not a thing! And there is no ambiguity being strung out there – it just “It takes (took) time. It requires (required) effort.” Which did evolve and anyone who has really spent time looking into the information are not lame conspiracy followers. So, this is where I wholeheartedly disagree with Jovan.
Stay tuned for much to be released. The Venezuela hit to sequester Maduro was primarily about the 2020 Grand Jury Indictment and Charges, but it involves multifaceted purposes, for Venezuela, US and many other country’s people. If Jovan joins the “Maduro was kidnapped” crowd – that will be all it will take for me to realize his true motives.
And believe me “An external villain lets us outsource the shame.”, is not a thing! And there is no ambiguity being strung out there – it just “It takes (took) time. It requires (required) effort.” Which did evolve and anyone who has really spent time looking into the information are not lame conspiracy followers. So, this is where I wholeheartedly disagree with Jovan.
Stay tuned for much to be released. The Venezuela hit to sequester Maduro was primarily about the 2020 Grand Jury Indictment and Charges, but it involves multifaceted purposes, for Venezuela, US and many other country’s people. If Jovan joins the “Maduro was kidnapped” crowd – that will be all it will take for me to realize his true motives.
Jovan, I believe your work is solid but it is only in one state and county. It is not possible that you are the only election fraud investigator that is not a “con.” You cannot disparage everyone else and expect anyone to take you seriously. This makes me very sad that patriots who each worked so hard have now dissolved into a circular firing squad. And I’m afraid the state is going to come after you demanding your data as state property (which they wish to destroy). I suppose that “God is in control” and we just have to hope things work out despite the chaos.
My goal is NOT presenting myself, team or work as "we are the only ones not a con". What I am doing is pointing out "what will not stand up in a court of law" and that it very differnt from what you characterized. My contract clearly states "our data" is "our data" and there is no way around that. As for that, it is what it is. But it will be very interesting to see what "pops up" In fact, we took an unsolicited call (from AZ person), talked about sensative data (in Az), that was shared with a Conservative Lawmaker and then the CLAIM from AZ Mirror popped up "outta the blue". LOL All of these things and events can now be easily be tracked back to "people" in AZ who say they are "fighting the good fight and are Patriots" but they prove undercover to be something different. Yet, as always, this is a battle, a war and tons of junk. We knew this going in an prepared wisely and legally. We are in it for the long haul and we see the "movements" going on. But as always - Truth always comes forth.
I agree except the only one I see firing is Jovan. I've not heard anyone he takes pot shots at even bring him up, but he names names or at least shows pictures. Everyone is wrong but him. I got sick of it a long time ago. In 2020, paper was the backup to the fraud, intended coverup so to speak. He's not wrong about the paper anomalies - yes they messed that up big time, so it was easy to find. Digging deeper was not as easy, but it was and the findings are all correct. I just wish he would stop disparaging everyone else...it doesn't look good - on him. This should be a concerted effort, but according to him his findings are the only election fraud that occurred. Makes one wonder who's side he's on.
You’re a liar and a hater. Take me off your list. Shame on you.
Jovan, this is not necessary. Everyone would welcome your paper part of election fraud if you would consider it is just a part of the overall issues with our elections. It was the backup to the fraud - coverup part, full stop. No one really fighting this with receipts that will be revealed soon, are attacking you, and I highly recommend you join forces rather than making this your way or no way was there fraud shown by their investigations/intel/proof. I don't know if it's too late, but if it isn't, could you try to make your way back to helping show the coverup part to this? If you can't or won't do that then you're not helping, you're hindering. Also, the main issue with the attorneys, orgs and courts is lawfare and you know it. Coomer thinks he's protected. Backing down or catering to that is not the answer. Certainly you are not - right?
I'm saying this as someone who appreciated your input...until it was put as the only way fraud occurred and you lashed out at anyone with any other discourse in the matter. Almost in a nefarious way to get people to NOT look. Too many people know better than that now and much will be revealed...in the right time - some people's lives are on the line, one you are going against. I've just gotten to the point I'm not sure you ever intended on helping? And no, asking to have people on your show before you've even seen ALL the information being released does not work. They have networks or platforms too - maybe go to them?
Have you talked with Trump? Are you an attorney or in the legal field? Just curious.
Strange, it seems to me the paper evidence has been suppressed and ridiculed from day one, beginning with the Arizona AG’s office. Many act like the audit findings don’t even exist. They would be welcomed if it wasn’t for personality issues? That makes one wonder how serious the ‘fighters’ are about proving their own findings.
Any reveals accompanied by hard evidence are welcome! Why push it so close to midterms, tho? Unless there is a solution where the judicial system is left out… Otherwise, it would behoof many to take Jovan’s advice, lawyer or not.
Everything in question has been suppressed and ridiculed from day one, by either the SOS, Election Commission, AG, Governor, along with the media, etc. – all based on Krebs and others saying “It was the most secure election”. I think you misunderstood me, I said he and his paper evidence would be welcome to be discussed more than it already has if he were actually interested in adding it to the piles of evidence, but he denies it all instead and ridicules them all. The proof is available in many reports, but what Jovan does is dismiss them as being false, incorrect, made up, etc., and claims the only fraud that really exists is paper related. Well there are some places, like CO where the paper was not the issue and if Tina Peters had not backed up the election machines information CO would have gotten away with breaking federal law by deleting the 2020 and 2021 election information from the machines – so no AUDIT could occur. And, that doesn’t explain what many of us saw before our very eyes when touch machines changed our choice, the tally numbers mysteriously reduced on TV – I mean as people were still voting, how do vote tallies reverse, among many other unexplained issues.
What happened is people were threatened and many were sued – by the voting machine companies, we were told we couldn’t question our elections, even though they have been throughout time. And according to Jovan that was to be expected and we went about it all wrong…
How is that advice? And after all the work 100’s of 1000’s of people did they should just walk away because it’s a losing battle? Because of the way they presented it? The problem is the lawfare, companies should not be able to sidestep audits of the people when we pay for the service. At some point there has to be accountability for errors, let alone fraud! If we walk away now, we should just turn out the lights on our nation. No thanks, Jovan, but for some reason I think you are really hoping we’ll bite. And believe me “An external villain lets us outsource the shame.”, is not a thing! And there is no ambiguity being strung out there – it just “It takes (took) time. It requires (required) effort.” Which did evolve and anyone who has really spent time looking into the information are not lame conspiracy followers. So, this is where I wholeheartedly disagree with Jovan.
Stay tuned for much to be released. The Venezuela hit to sequester Maduro was primarily about the 2020 Grand Jury Indictment and Charges, but it involves multifaceted purposes, for Venezuela, US and many other country’s people. If Jovan joins the “Maduro was kidnapped” crowd – that will be all it will take for me to realize his true motives.
And believe me “An external villain lets us outsource the shame.”, is not a thing! And there is no ambiguity being strung out there – it just “It takes (took) time. It requires (required) effort.” Which did evolve and anyone who has really spent time looking into the information are not lame conspiracy followers. So, this is where I wholeheartedly disagree with Jovan.
Stay tuned for much to be released. The Venezuela hit to sequester Maduro was primarily about the 2020 Grand Jury Indictment and Charges, but it involves multifaceted purposes, for Venezuela, US and many other country’s people. If Jovan joins the “Maduro was kidnapped” crowd – that will be all it will take for me to realize his true motives.